RE: RE: Little Comparison (related to tranny trouble)

From: Jon Winkelhake (jon_w@tjhale.com)
Date: Tue Nov 30 1999 - 13:45:18 EST


Greg - Yeah, it was the older style (Chreokee Sport, not the Grand
Cherokee). Oh, yes, gotta love that in-line 6. We were passing people left &
right on the highway down in Kansas. But as far as comfort is concerned,
I'll take my Dak any day.

Jon W.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of NVMYDakota@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 11:00 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Little Comparison (related to tranny trouble)

In a message dated 11/30/99 6:44:56 AM Mountain Standard Time,
jon_w@tjhale.com writes:

> Frank - Hang in there with your tranny troubles. As far as the Cherokee is
> concerned, you're right on the money. My wife & I flew to Kansas for a
> wedding and rented a Cherokee (we were supposed to have been given an
> Intrepid), and except for the torque monster 4.0L I-6 motor, we hated it!
> Talk about your freeway noise! On the plus side, we hit a huge rainstorm
> while we were down there and washed out several backroads. First time
I've
> ever used or driven something with 4WD. (Thank God we didn't have the
> Intrepid!) But overall we were not impressed. Just my $0.02.
>
> Jon W.

Are you all talking about the New Style Cherokee or the older ones...

Personally I love my sisters 89 Cherokee (atleast until she got it), It was
noisy on the highway (place were jeeps aren't ment to be) but in the city,
it
hauled ass of the line, and could go far beyond any P/U Truck that I ever
offroaded with, No offense to anyone, maybe they were idiots, or maybe I was
an Idiot, reguardless, they'd all get stuck and I'd have to pull their asses
out.
                                Greg



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:39 EDT