Re: RE: C@C vs. Mopar Nats opinions

From: kyle oberlee (ober7024@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 02 1999 - 13:28:07 EST


i would second josh's vote carlisle is a great show but the mopar nats is a
great show a great race and probably the funnest cruzing a mopar nut could
ever experience
i dont miss the mopar nats for anything

>From: "Josh Brown" <jbrown@patriotfinance.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: DML: RE: C@C vs. Mopar Nats opinions
>Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:42:49 -0800
>
>without a doubt, the Mopar Nats, every Chrysler fanatic has to experience
>brice road, it is truly spiritual to a mopar man's heart.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Bob Tom
>Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 9:52 AM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: C@C vs Mopar Nats opinions
>
>
>Hi, all.
>I was able to make the '99 C@C but not the '99 Mopar Nats.
>Next year, I'll be able to make only one as well. Any
>opinions as how they differ (if at all) would be appreciated.
>I'm leaning towards the Mopar Nats because of the 1/4-mi. track.
>TIA.
>
>Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
>97 FR CC Dakota Sport,5.2L,3.55SG, auto.,4x2, best 14.917 sec., 90.78 mph
>96 Grand Caravan ES,3.8L
>85 Shelby Intercooled Turbo Charger,2.2L,5-spd man.
>70 Challenger,383-4bbl,slap-stik auto.,3.23SG,hemi orange,46,700 orig. mi.
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:45 EST