Re: RE: Intense Stage II intakes? - Opinion LONG!!!

From: SS454454@aol.com
Date: Wed Dec 08 1999 - 22:13:18 EST

Next message: Dester223@aol.com: "Re: expensive parts"
Previous message: Tim Berry: "Fw: Take a look at the future!"
Maybe in reply to: John Mautz: "RE: Intense Stage II intakes? - Opinion LONG!!!"
Next in thread: SwingtimeM@aol.com: "Re: RE: Intense Stage II intakes? - Opinion LONG!!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

You should be very close. you have less power but he weighs more. You should
be pretty equal
Rob

Next message: Dester223@aol.com: "Re: expensive parts"
Previous message: Tim Berry: "Fw: Take a look at the future!"
Maybe in reply to: John Mautz: "RE: Intense Stage II intakes? - Opinion LONG!!!"
Next in thread: SwingtimeM@aol.com: "Re: RE: Intense Stage II intakes? - Opinion LONG!!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:49 EST