Re: Ford 9"

From: Clay Cooke (cooke@ecn.purdue.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 18 2000 - 22:39:13 EST


Well Mike, dont know where your located really, but if I was relaively
close to Richmond Indiana I would go with Moser. they are cheap, and
EXCELLENT service and quality of product! I took two rear ends down, 8.75"
and a Dana 60 and had both shortened in 4 hours. Got them there at 8am,
picked em up at noon, 400 bucks. That includes shortening them, new axel
housing ends, new bearings (timiken), new AXLES!, and a coupla other
things, anyway, great price, and it is still alive behind close to 600
HP... also, its just my opinion, but dont count out the old chrysler
8.75... I would take it over a ford 9" any day of the week... plus I would
never put anything labeled ford on my truck.... :) IMHO

Clay

84 Dodge Ram, scrappin pavement w/ 440 8bbl
96 Indy Ram, scrappin EVERYTHING w/ 360 Magnum!' -(www.indyram.org)
69 Road Runner 440 6bbl, project car

http://expert.cc.purdue.edu/~cooke

On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Mike Schwall wrote:

> At 09:24 PM 1/18/2000 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hey all,
> >anyone know of a place that I can get a Ford 9" shortened to fit my 88
> >dak? Nobody seems to be able to help....
> >
> >-mike d.
>
> Try Drivetrain Specialists Inc. of Las Vegas. http://www.drivetrain.com
> It's not going to be cheap. Best bet is to find someone who can operate an
> arc welder and has access to a metal lathe. I've seen shortening jobs done
> before (friend of the family has a 9" under a chebby that he races dirt
> track with). Process involves cutting the tubes, reducing length and
> welding them back on. Same with the axles, cut to reduce length and weld
> them back together and balance them. Pretty straight forward job, but not
> recommended by someone new to the job. It's not as simple as it
> sounds. Just my $.02.
>
> Another try might be Currie Enterprises http://www.4x4now.com/4wsjpcr.htm
>
> Good luck
> Mike Schwall
>
> __________________________
> mschwall@flash.net
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:53 EDT