RE: Cold-Air Intake

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 11:54:22 EST


George, excellent job on that homemade K&N. Looks very professional.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD,MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, US Marine Corps
mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil (work)
mailto:Saint1958@home.com (home)
Office: (760) 725-2296

-----Original Message-----
From: George Hernandez [mailto:georgeh@tocquigny.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 6:20 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Cold-Air Intake

I got rid of the stock peice, as all the kinks and bends in it are sure to
cause
turbulence. I went to home depot, got some 3"PVC pipe, 2 45 degree DWV
joints,
and a 3" to 3" rubber joint (complete with hose clamps). Check out
http://users.jnlk.com/dakrt/Homemade2.htm
for more info.

fawcett@uism.bu.edu wrote:

> VERY specific question (I don't want to start the whole debate over
again)!
>
> I've seen some home-made intakes that re-use the stock flexible rubber
fitting
> that attaches to the air hat and some that run a pipe right up to the air
> hat... Is there a consensus or explanation why one would be better than
the
> other? It looks like it would be easier to use the rubber fitting.
>
> I got my K&N cone filter today and I'm just trying to figure out the best
way
> to rig it.
> TIA!
> Tom

--
George Hernandez
Tocquigny Advertising + Design
512.329.8065  ext.135
Fax: 512.328.5645



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:55 EDT