RE: Group Dyno 4.7 vs 5.9 here we goooooooooooooooooooo!!!

From: Barret, Matt (MATT_BARRET@earthtech.com)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2000 - 08:45:16 EST


Yep your right Aaron, its in the 200-210 range. I am currently trying to
schedule my Dyno run for February. I am going to put my truck back to stock
form and run it, then put on my K&N open element intake and run the truck.
I will be sure to post my results. As I have said before, the Dyno sheet
won't lie!
__________________________________
Matt -- Mechanicsville, VA
`00 Sport Plus 4.7L 5spd. 9 1/4 3.92 LSD RC 2x4
Homemade K&N open element, Traction Bars,
Spring clamps, ... BEST 1/4 14.871 @ 91.01 MPH
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron [mailto:acolona@i-55.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 12:16 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Group Dyno 4.7 vs 5.9 here we goooooooooooooooooooo!!!

<pardon me, no no no. I'm sorry but a 4.7 auto is making nowhere near 225 at
<the rear tires. The 5.9 (and I don't like that engine) makes approximately
<175 at the rear wheels stock. The auto is horrible and sucks massive
amounts
<of power away. Even a 4.7 manual couldn't be making that much because the
<manual setup still takes about 20 horses out. Your looking at 205 best with
<a manual.

----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Tom <tigers@bserv.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Group Dyno 4.7 vs 5.9 here we goooooooooooooooooooo!!!

> I hope that a '00 4.7 RC auto. makes it to your dyno tests.
>
> My guess from ETs posted so far from 4.7 owners would be
> 225-230 hp at the rears and about 300 torque at the rears.
> Peak torque at about 3400 rpm and peak hp at about 4900 rpm.
>
> Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
> '97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:09 EDT