5.2 vs4.7

From: Scubagatr@aol.com
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 08:52:40 EST

Next message: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: Dying batteries"
Previous message: Bob King: "Re: RE: Re: Worst Built Cars of the Century"
Next in thread: Aaron: "Re: 5.2 vs4.7"
Reply: Aaron: "Re: 5.2 vs4.7"
Maybe reply: Chris Lambert: "5.2 vs4.7"
Maybe reply: Chris Lambert: "Re: Re: Re: 5.2 vs4.7"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Does anybody have an opinion. Is there anybody that has a 4.7 that wishes
they had a 5.2?

Long live the 318

Dave Naples, FL(97 cc 5.2 2wd SLT) STOCK and loving it

Next message: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: Dying batteries"
Previous message: Bob King: "Re: RE: Re: Worst Built Cars of the Century"
Next in thread: Aaron: "Re: 5.2 vs4.7"
Reply: Aaron: "Re: 5.2 vs4.7"
Maybe reply: Chris Lambert: "5.2 vs4.7"
Maybe reply: Chris Lambert: "Re: Re: Re: 5.2 vs4.7"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:48:03 EDT