Sorry but go for the SC if the money is no problem. But for the NOS, listen
to those who been-there-and-done-that deal. See what problems had happen
and the price is fairly cheap. You can even get a 50lb bottle now.
=================================
Steve St.Laurent
2000 DC Dakota 4.7, CC, 4x2, 3:55 (soon 330HP)
2000 Roush Mustang Stage I (awaiting the new SC)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Neal Arita
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 12:34 PM
To: 'Dakota Mailing List'
Subject: DML: Re: Octane Booster Advice
Thanks Bernd and Steve,
I appreciate your comments. I realize it matters what you have in the
motor...my question really should have been: "how much (if any) will
octane
boosters do for my set-up?" Jet Stage II advances timing a bit, not
enough for
pinging problems. Would I be wasting money with booster? (am I putting
my
foot in my mouth?....I have a feeling I will be told to put in NOS or SC
)...hehehe
Thanks again...
Neal Arita - from Hawaii
(anyone else out here...in Hawaii...maybe I'll make some cards too)
'97 5.2, CC, Auto
>From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net <mailto:bernd@texas.net> >
>Mild correction: "Stock motors" without head/intake/cam work NO!!! -
Not
<snip>
>From: "Steve St.Laurent" <saint1958@home.com
<mailto:saint1958@home.com> >
>After talking to some friends who are SVT engineers, the reason behind
the
>running the 87 Octane level is that they must meet the CA CARB board
<snip>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:48:09 EDT