Re: Durango vs Dakota

From: Bob Tom (tigers@bserv.com)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 15:21:32 EST


At 11:45 AM 3/16/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Okay guys I need some benchracing opinions!
>First Goliath:
>My buddy has a 99 Durango 4x4 with the 360.
>It has Mopar Headers, Mopar Catback, and a K&N air intake.
>He has the ram air hood but its non functional right now.
>I don't know the gearing. But those white viper stripes he
>put on it must be worth a coupla tenths!!!
>Now here comes David.....
>My new '00 Dak, SLT+ Luxo Club Cab
>4.7L Auto
>3.92 gears with (pick one) Sure-Grip, Limited Slip, Trak-Lock, or Anti-Spin
>255-65-15 Goodyear Eagle LS's (Wide but, hard compound)
>I have a Gibson Catback with no other mods (yet!).

Chock another one up for David! All the figures that I've seen
on the 360 Durangos indicated that it's just too heavy ...
probably looking at 800 lbs (?) difference at least.

Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
97 Dakota CC Sport,5.2L,3.55SG, auto.,4x2: best 14.917s, 90.78mph
85 Shelby Intercooled Turbo Charger,2.2L,5-spd man.
78 B100 Dodge van, '69 340-4bbl
70 Challenger,383-4bbl,slap-stik auto.,3.23SG,hemi orange,46,700 orig.mi.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:45 EDT