DAMN DC! #&$(% %$)$)$++ #@^%!% @#@#__)$_) This is about what I was saying
when the DAMN SL came on.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD,MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, US Marine Corps
mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil (work)
mailto:Saint1958@home.com (home)
Office: (760) 725-2296
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Scelfo [mailto:macncheesemonster@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 2:22 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Was: New to List/Dakota rec. Now: Speed limiter
110 and no sign of speed limiter here.
-- Dave>I had my Dak up to about 102 recently with no sign of the speed limiter. ( >I >thought I was going maybe 85 till I looked down and about crapped..) >Anyway, >there was a thread about 2 months ago about that and it was obvious tha the >speed limiter is not consistently applied across vehicles. I'd bet the same >is >true of the Toyotas. Some probably cut out before others. For me, I started >worrying about those Goodyear Wranglers, they aren't speed rated at all and >the thought of one coming apart at 102 mph gives me acute sphincter >pucker....... > >-------- previous post ---------- > >Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:30:42 -0800 >From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil> >Subject: DML: RE: Re: New to List/Dakota rec. > >I agree with exception to the speed limiter that stopped me after 97MPH >beating up the Tacoma V-6. I laughed because it took him sometime to catch >up then pass me. > > >Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:43:04 -0800 >From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil> >Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: HP RATINGS NEED > >Let us try that again the CC 4.7 is much lighter than the R/T 5.9 CC. The >numbers are upside down. >
______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:47 EDT