In a message dated 03/20/2000 10:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil writes:
steven
i have read this post four times and i still can't figure out what you are
trying to say.
<< First of all, you didn't read the e-mail very well to comprehend anything.
Then I noticed your signature, revealing that you have a RC when I plainly
stated that it was a 'CC'. Excuse me Matt, even I can see the difference in
weight just by viewing the vehicle with mine eyes.
<<About the 97MPH, since you never owned a 2000 CC 4.7, auto with an 3:55
rear
gear, tell me the weight of this vehicle, then tell me the speed limiter is
set at? >>
the part above in particular is confusing to me. the part at the beginning
about matt not having driven that particular vehicle makes sense but what are
you trying to say about the speed limiter?
<<Next time read the e-mail and its contents before replying. And
maybe I should do the same on the HP Rated e-mail.>>
<< But I would apologize for miscommunication before in the HP rating e-mail
if I was in error. >>
in the above line are you trying to say you made an error in a prior post and
apologized for it?
<<But the facts are facts. Not just me, but those test driven magazine from
Truck
Trend to Car & Driver, stating the same. The 4.7 CC and 5.9 CC R/T did not
share all the same parts. >>
i am not trying to be offensive to you steven but in your writing i am seeing
the pattern of a man translating from one language to another. is english
not your first tongue?
derek
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:52 EDT