THis sounds very interesting. What about using a VNT (i believe is whatit's
called) style turbo. Maening a turbo with the vanes inside it that a variable. I
know that honda had one of these and I believe that chrysler used them also in
the later turbo cars. They are supposed to give really big gains from a small
turba and almost completely eliminate lag. Not an expert in turbos just a
thought.
Jeff Durling
'96 RC Sport-318
Jon Steiger wrote:
> At 11:27 PM 3/28/00 -0500, you wrote:
> > To cut down the expense and complexity you could even go with a single
> > turbo
> >system. It would still make outrageous power.( frankly, more power then the
> >block could handle) I really see no reason to do a dual setup. 5.0 guys run
> >singles making 500-600-700-900 hp. Just look at the GN crowd! I do like the
> >idea of using the factory EFI. DFI will set you back at least $1500.
>
> Yep, a single turbo probably would be sufficient as far as power goes,
> but a dual setup should be a little better as far as lag and street driving
> goes... Also, the exhaust plumbing required for a single turbo could be a
> little hairy. It would need a crossover pipe to equalize the pressure
> between both cylinder banks, and there are several problems involved with
> that. I have a feeling it may actually be easier to do the plumbing for
> twin turbos.
>
> -Jon-
>
> .--- jon@dakota-truck.net -- or -- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ------------.
> | Jon Steiger * AOPA, DoD, EAA, MP Race Team, NMA, SPA, USUA * RP-SEL |
> | '92 Ram 150 4x4 V8, '96 Dakota V8, '96 Intruder 1400, '96 FireFly 447 |
> `---------------------------- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:50:14 EDT