Yeah, I read that too!! but what I love is look at all the $$$$ it takes
for the vette to be 0.1 seconds faster! I would still stick with the
Viper!
Clay
84 Dodge Ram, scrapin pavement w/ 440 8bbl
96 Indy Ram, scrapin EVERYTHING w/ 360 Magnum!' -(www.indyram.org)
69 Road Runner 440 6bbl, project car
http://expert.cc.purdue.edu/~cooke
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Preacher wrote:
> After reading the reviews on the Lingenfelter twin-turbo Corvette Stage II
> vs TNT King Snake Viper, I decided neither one could do what I wanted to do.
>
> The Corvette posted 13.6@106mph stock ($105,595.00) and 12.1@134mph with the
> twin turbo & other mods.($107,632.00)
>
> The Viper posted 12.2@118mph stock ($145,171.00) and 11.4@131mph
> modified.($162,251.00)
>
> I figure the best bang for the buck is the new BMW Z8 doing 13.0@111mph
> stock ($135,362.00)
> Put a couple of mods on there and you are well past the Viper at a
> substantial savings.... Hell, if a double turbo can give the Vette 1.5
> seconds and 28mph, think what it could do for a car that weighs in at
> probably 1000 pounds less :-)
>
> Now, If I could only win the lottery.....
> ===============================================
> Preacher
> Webmaster: http://www.bastaards.org
> Owner: http://www.onelist.com/community/BASTAARDS
> Columnist: http://www.wfthecoliseum.com
> ===============================================
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:50:35 EDT