3.92's vs. 4.10's

• Next message: Tim Berry: "off topic.. but good laugh..."
• Previous message: frank golembieski: "Re: Re[2]: SPOTS!!!!(long)"
• Next in thread: Tim Berry: "off topic.. but good laugh..."
• Reply: Tim Berry: "off topic.. but good laugh..."
• Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 3.92's vs. 4.10's"
• Maybe reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: RE: RE: 3.92's vs. 4.10's"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lambert: "3.92's vs. 4.10's"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lambert: "Re: 3.92's vs. 4.10's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi All,

    I know this has been discussed before, but ... I have the chance
to get some new 3.92 gears for my Dakota. I was wondering how much
of a butt-dyno difference there would be between the 3.92's and 4.10's.
I don't do that much highway driving so I'm not concerned with the
difference in highway rpm's. I'm just wondering if I should hold out
for 4.10's or if the 3.92's are adequate for my straight line needs. I have
3.55's now with a 5 speed. Thanks for any input.

Chuck Robbins
'99 Dakota Sport
http://www.members.home.com/clrobbins/dakota.htm
(totally redesigned main page)

• Next message: Tim Berry: "off topic.. but good laugh..."
• Previous message: frank golembieski: "Re: Re[2]: SPOTS!!!!(long)"
• Next in thread: Tim Berry: "off topic.. but good laugh..."
• Reply: Tim Berry: "off topic.. but good laugh..."
• Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 3.92's vs. 4.10's"
• Maybe reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Re: RE: RE: 3.92's vs. 4.10's"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lambert: "3.92's vs. 4.10's"
• Maybe reply: Chris Lambert: "Re: 3.92's vs. 4.10's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:50:56 EDT