RE: RE: Balljoints and no DAK

From: Greig, Doug (douggr@hazelett.com)
Date: Wed Jul 05 2000 - 09:08:52 EDT


Thanks man (snif) I'll get through it. Time to buck up and face it like a
man....

 - Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch [SMTP:bernd@texas.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 8:53 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: Balljoints and no DAK
>
> Doug,
>
> We feel your pain. Nobody should be without their Dak. :(
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: Balljoints and no DAK
>
>
> I had my Dak inspected last friday. I was a little worried about it
> passing
> emmisions because of the mod's I've done to the intake. Emmissions were no
> problem at all! The ball joints on the other hand were absoluteley
> trashed.
> I've owned my Dak for a year now and this is the first time I've had to go
> without it :-( . I won't have it again until the 10th!!! The garage that's
> fixing it can't repair it until than. I thought about doing it myself, but
> after talking to many friends who have done extensive mechanical work all
> cringed when I brought it up, I guess I'll just have to wait. So here I
> will
> sit, crying into my coffee, dreaming of better days..............
>
> Doug Greig - wallowing in self pity
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:32 EDT