I would think it will help with the articulation on the front. You get rid of
that link that ties the control arms together and limits the travel of one side
based on the other. I 've also heard of people disconnecting it for 1/4 mile
runs to get the weight to transfer to the rear easier. The other thing is street
handling sucks without it.
Doug Fedeli
Kyle Kozubal wrote:
> Has anyone actually ran/driven their Dak without the front factory anti-sway
> bar? Or just with it disconnected? I should have experimented when I
> replaced the rotted out rubber anti-sway bar 'bushings' and left the bar off
> and driven it around, but I didnt. Since it is very easy to unbolt the bar
> from the lower control arms, I may do this soon, just to see how the Dak
> behaves both on and off road. I would love to do some measuring with a floor
> jack and some car ramps to see if I would gain some added articulation, if
> any. Not sure how the bar looks or is connected on GenIII 4WD Dakotas, but
> on my GenII, there are 2 self tapping bolts which hold the bar onto the
> lower control arm. I could unbolt the bar from here, and swing it back and
> tie it securely to the frame, just to see what the pros/cons are of having
> is 'disconnected' on a Dakota. Other than being bolted to the lower control
> arm, there is a 'frame crossmember' or brace which has 2 more bar mounts,
> one really on each side of the frame; once again held on by bolts and nuts.
> Hmmmm.........
> Kyle
> 93 Dakota 4x4 V6
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:43 EDT