Re: 180T statment. Correct?

From: Andy Levy (andylevy@bigfoot.com)
Date: Fri Jul 28 2000 - 07:49:50 EDT


Advance Auto Parts? They told me a similar story, but it was gas
mileage and emissions that would suffer, not the pistons and cat.

The computer will figure it out. With the number of people running a
180T on the list here, any serious problems would have been discovered
by now.

Looper wrote:
>
> I saw this statement about using the 180T.
> Does this sound correct?
>
> "Do you know that messing with the thermostat
> increases the amount of fuel delivered to the
> cylinders, which doesn't completely burn. In turn,
> the O2 sensor tells the computer to lean out the
> mixture, and then before you know it you've lean
> burned a hole in a piston, not to mention burning out
> the catalytic converter"
>
> I my be wrong on this but:
> If the mixture is normal/correct and you change to a
> 180T then its runs rich which causes the computer to
> lean it back out aren't you back too the
> normal/correct
> mixture.
>
> =====
> Flame Red 2000 QC SLT V6 Manual
> Right now I'm OEM boy.
> Soon to be Aftermarket boy...
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
> http://invites.yahoo.com/

-- 
-andy

http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@bigfoot.com ------------------------------------------------------------- "I spilled spot remover on my dog. He's gone now..." --- Steve Wright -------------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:51 EDT