Dyno Jet Steven, 208 the first time, and 209.9 @ Chryslers @ Carlisle show
last month.
My Flowmaster cat back system net 1.9 RWHP +-.
First time (K&N filter/Air intake ,Mobil 1,)
Second time (K&N filter/Air intake ,Mobil 1,Flowmaster cat back 3")
Also a CA LEV 230hp version, all 3 cats!!
__________________________________
Matt--VA--Y2K-HEMI `00 Sport Plus RC 4.7L 5spd
-----Original Message Follows -----
From: Stlaurent Mr Steven [mailto:STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 2:40 PM
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
Subject: DML: RE: pics of my truck ATTN: Steve
Sorry, but I have seen two different Dyno ticket, both stock on a 5 speed
and an auto. The 5 speed was rated around 207HP and the auto was rated
around 185.84 (CA 230HP version). I don't do the math but look the output
tickets. The Dynojet equipment out in a local Escondido (CA) speed shop is
fairly new. I really don't know what equipment Kenne uses for his testing
but there is a big difference. I wonder what is the tolerance level of error
is on his machine?
I witness already three Daks with the 4.7 and they have almost the same
output. In the comparison of Golden West Powerdyne testing on the 5.9. I
would expect a greater HP expectation from the 4.7 versus the 5.9 by at
least 5-7 percent on the rear wheel HP. With a 12PSI boost on the Powerdyne
it pushes the 5.9 to 376 rear wheel HP but then a 4.7 with the same mods
will push the same or more with less driveline lost.
Matt's has a Dyno ticket (5 speed, RC, 3.93 gear) and confirms my earlier
suspicion why the 4.7 just as quick as the 5.9 R/T. His Dyno ticket said
the same as the local Daks here within less than 1.0 percent error margin.
However, I don't which version of Dyno equipment it was done on.
This is why I am asking...
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:13 EDT