Just so that everyone knows, I run 30# injectors in my truck. It works O.K.
but it is a little rich, but no bogging. I will either be going to 24# or
getting the computer reprogrammed. By the way Bob (Tom), where did you get
yours reprogrammed?
Mark Kuzia
flyboy01@mediaone.net
http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/home.html
1995 Dakota 13.79 @ 99.52 mph
360ci, 5-spd, 4.11 LS, Ram-air
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Mankin" <bob@cadpros.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Hi-Perf. INJECTORS
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: <HCSwmr@aol.com>
> > >To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 9:09 AM
> > >Subject: Re: DML: RE: Hi-Perf. INJECTORS
> > >> Do you have to use the 19# injectors or can you go higher?
> >
> > On my 5.2L, with MPI, Magnum R/T cam, F&B Stage 1 tb, MP computer
> > stock fuel pressure and dynoed at a measured 231 rwhp (~290 hp
> > at the crank), I tested the 24# injectors. At WOT, there was heavy-duty
> > bogging and massive carbon soot coming out of the tail pipes. At part
> > throttle,
> > the O2 sensor output stayed on rich longer than lean in closed loop
> > and, after about 5 minutes, the cat O2 sensor output stayed on rich.
> > Just far too rich for my setup.
> >
> > Bob. Ont, Canada.
> > '97 Dakota CC, 5.2L, 4x2, 3.92 SG, auto., 4265 lb.
> > PB: 14.737 @ 91.75 9.364 @ 72.95
>
> Bob,
>
> Were there any exhaust mods done to the truck prior to that test or is
> it stock?
>
> Bob
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:20 EDT