RE: Re: BRAND THERMOSTAT 180

From: Jon Steiger (jon@dakota-truck.net)
Date: Sat Aug 12 2000 - 23:32:24 EDT


At 08:11 PM 8/12/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Robertshaw or Jet is more precise. If you have a 180 that's hotter than 195
>that's 10% or worse error. YECH!

   I used to run a Stant heavy duty, but when I installed the MPI, I needed
a new t-stat so I tried a Robert Shaw. The needle sits in the same place
for both of 'em. I've had good luck with both brands. The Robert Shaw is
built a little differently than a standard t-stat, and its supposed to be
immune to sticking open (or shut?) something like that. Maybe someone else
knows. :-)

                                               -Jon-

   .--- Jon Steiger ---- jon@dakota-truck.net or stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ---.
   | Affiliations: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA; Rec & UL Pilot - SEL |
   | '92 Ram 150 4x4 V8, '96 Dakota V8, '96 Intruder 1400, '96 FireFly 447 |
   `------------------------------ http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ----'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:23 EDT