RE: RE: Intense Performace Cone Filters

From: Steven St.Laurent (Saint1958@home.com)
Date: Fri Aug 25 2000 - 16:34:55 EDT


When I installed a larger cone than the 3x9, I felt the lost in the lower
range but the pickup in the upper RPM.

Bob, how much did you pay for the tubing? Did you get the Powder coated
color one?

 -----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net] On Behalf Of Bob Mankin
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 3:37 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Intense Performace Cone Filters

Stlaurent Mr Steven wrote:
>
> Before you do that I would not go big you will lose the bottom end range.
> Tony from Quick D discussed this earlier and he is right. I have a bigger
> cone then the standard 3x9 and now looking for a smaller one in September
> 3x6.

Steven,

I would think the limiting factor would be the metal tube and not the
filter. Therefore I can't understand the logic.

That being said, I installed an Intense Performance unit a couple of
weeks ago to replace an open element 14x3 K&N. Definite improvement. A
day later I installed MSD6, new plugs cap and rotor. Bottom end picked
up a bunch. With all of that new gear I must have picked up 15+
horsepower based on the Butt Dyno feedback.

Anyone looking for a 14x3 K&N setup?

Bob



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:41 EDT