Re: RE: Mopar PCM vs Intake/Exhaust Upgrades?

From: Ohm347@aol.com
Date: Fri Sep 01 2000 - 21:27:05 EDT

Next message: Mike Klinke: "Re: RE: Rear End"
Previous message: Mark Kuzia: "Re: Re: Re: Re: MICH count(was Marks hood )"
Maybe in reply to: Wisotzkey, Rich: "RE: Mopar PCM vs Intake/Exhaust Upgrades?"
Next in thread: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: Mopar PCM vs Intake/Exhaust Upgrades?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 09/01/2000 3:45:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
ron-wong@home.com writes:

<< I would go exhaust first, then PCM. >>
make it a 3" though

Next message: Mike Klinke: "Re: RE: Rear End"
Previous message: Mark Kuzia: "Re: Re: Re: Re: MICH count(was Marks hood )"
Maybe in reply to: Wisotzkey, Rich: "RE: Mopar PCM vs Intake/Exhaust Upgrades?"
Next in thread: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: Mopar PCM vs Intake/Exhaust Upgrades?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:22 EDT