Re: R/T difference

From: Jack Hilton (hemi@charter.net)
Date: Tue Sep 05 2000 - 08:36:47 EDT

Next message: Barret, Matt: "RE: R/T difference Re: Jack"
Previous message: Jack Hilton: "Re: R/T difference Re: Jack"
In reply to: Barret, Matt: "RE: R/T difference"
Next in thread: Barret, Matt: "RE: R/T difference"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Then I stand corrected.

Jack

"Barret, Matt" wrote:

> The 9.25" rear is standard on the 2000/2001 4.7L.
>
> __________________________________
> Matt

Next message: Barret, Matt: "RE: R/T difference Re: Jack"
Previous message: Jack Hilton: "Re: R/T difference Re: Jack"
In reply to: Barret, Matt: "RE: R/T difference"
Next in thread: Barret, Matt: "RE: R/T difference"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:26 EDT