Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T

• Next message: Jack Hilton: "Re: R/T difference Re: Sam"
• Previous message: Jack Hilton: "Re: R/T octane?"
• In reply to: Ransom T Holbrook: "Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
• Next in thread: Ransom T Holbrook: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
• Reply: Ransom T Holbrook: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>

Well, I dunno what the exact diff. in weight is, but from what I remember,
there was only about a 300-400lb diff. in weight between a RC and a CC. Is the
5.9 that much more heavy ?

Jack

> In addition when considering 1/4 mile times,
> you will find that a RC 4.7 5 speed is around 350lbs lighter than a similar
> equipped R/T.

• Next message: Jack Hilton: "Re: R/T difference Re: Sam"
• Previous message: Jack Hilton: "Re: R/T octane?"
• In reply to: Ransom T Holbrook: "Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
• Next in thread: Ransom T Holbrook: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
• Reply: Ransom T Holbrook: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:26 EDT