RE: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 10:53:58 EDT


In the entertainment business there is a motto goes like this: ...it isn't
over until the FAT LADY SINGING. Is she singing?????

-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Wong [mailto:ron-wong@home.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:44 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T

HERE HERE!

Ron
00 SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
For modifications see my DML Profile

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of ABadDakota
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:23 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T

Why don't we just get one person with a 4.7, and one with the R/T and put
this topic to rest FOR
GODS SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think that we should all be proud that we have such a great choice of
engines.

Tom

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:26 EDT