Re: First year for mgnum engines?

From: will weslow (1991dak@team.camaroZ28.com)
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 09:16:57 EDT

Next message: Barret, Matt: "RE: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Previous message: Greig, Doug: "Super eRam update - Need Advice"
Maybe in reply to: The Stewarts: "First year for mgnum engines?"
Next in thread: Jack Hilton: "Re: First year for mgnum engines?"
Reply: Jack Hilton: "Re: First year for mgnum engines?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The 92' was the first year for the magnum 5.2 and 3.9in both the Ram and the dakota. the rated HP according to excite.com was 230bhp. and also a little side note: the 5.9 didn't get the magnum setup until 93'FYI

Will W.
91'CC 318 4x4

--- "The Stewarts" <firebird@kymtnnet.org>
> wrote:
>
>Hey guys. What was the first year for the Magnum 5.2 in the Dakota. How
>much HP? I think it was 93, but am not totally sure. Also, what is the tow
>rating?
> Brian

_____________________________________________________________
Free E-mail by CamaroZ28.Com - FULL THROTTLE INTERNET

Next message: Barret, Matt: "RE: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Previous message: Greig, Doug: "Super eRam update - Need Advice"
Maybe in reply to: The Stewarts: "First year for mgnum engines?"
Next in thread: Jack Hilton: "Re: First year for mgnum engines?"
Reply: Jack Hilton: "Re: First year for mgnum engines?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:27 EDT