Re: Marks "Hemi Dak"

From: Nate & Brenda Johnson (nbjohnson@networld.com)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 23:12:56 EDT


I think the first clue would be the OBVIOUS difference in lighting between the engine bay and the
engine itself in Exhibit A.
Who knows... the airbrush overspray could of easily been just tryin' to fix something up, if it
wasn't for the lighting! That's what really throws me. It jumped right out at me as soon as I
looked at it! The rest of the pics seem to be believeable but Exhibit A? Just looks fake! Hmmmm...
(The pullies don't look right either...)

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Kurtz <erickurtz@ameritech.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 8:48 PM
Subject: DML: Marks "Hemi Dak"

> Hey DML'ers, I think Mark was pulling our Legs!!
>
> First, I would like to explain that jealousy is not the issue here! I'm
> just a little curious about a few things in the "Hemi Dak" picture of Marks.
> I work in an environment that puts out pictures like this alll day! In
> fact, those pictures are what we create models from.
> 1) The angle of the engine sitting in the compartment is impossible from
> what I see. Exhibit A!!
> http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/hemidak.jpg
> Wouldn't the angle of this put the tranny well passed the floor board?
> 2) Please see Exhibit B! 6th picture down. I would be advisable to have
> both exhibits on the desk top at the same time so you can compare.
> http://people.mw.mediaone.net/flyboy01/engine.html
> Notice the computer at bottom, tape on the wiring harness near firewall,
> angle of the hood open and the tell tale sign; the red rag, white rag, and
> medicine bottle on the battery IN BOTH PICTURES!! Wouldn't you atleast move
> the last three items before or after a motor swap? They certainly wouldn't
> be there all the way through the procedure! The photographer even stood in
> the exact same spot and at the exact same height to take both photos, if
> both were real. But I don't think they are.
> What first tipped me off, was the little black mark on the lower pulley
> rearward of the pulley. That is an airbrush over spray from Photo Shop!
> Just my opinion, but my experience with Mark, Photo Shop, Alias, and
> Illustrator tells me it's Fake.
> I could be wrong, but I don't think I am. If I am, I will leave the list.
> If not, can people be allowed to intentionally mislead the DML? Or was Mark
> just pulling our legs? You be the judge
> Eric Kurtz
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:48 EDT