-----Original Message-----
From: Antonio De Anda [mailto:adeanda@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 3:33 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: RE: Quick-D Throttle Body Re:Tony De Anda
<<<You guys must have nothing better to do than DREAM up issues to argue
about.......>>>
Not arguing here Tony??? You haven't given any results on your TB to argue
about.
<<I have been asked about the Dyno #s on the 4.7 TB, and my usual response
is I
dont have any #s yet.>>
I have asked no less than 2 times, and got no response.
<<I never post my #s for the exact reason that there are some of you out
there
that will say I am floating the #s.>>
You post the correct numbers, we buy the TB, do our own dyno testing, if
they don't match within tolerable limits we will talk about floating
numbers.
<<ALL THE #S ON MY PAGE ARE FROM CUSTOMERS RESULTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
was that clear enough.
mainly from the RT club. I doubt those guys are wrong.>>
Um, if I remember right, we are talking 4.7L here Tony, not RT. this is a
totally different animal.
<<Now lets think.......how many people out there have 4.7 TBs............Oh
yeah,
ONE,
and that is my test truck. We are starting to ship out the TBs this week,
so
the #s will start coming back pretty soon.>>
I don't make a habit out of spending that kinda money on a "lets see what
this does basis" Tony, I wish I had that kinda money to throw around. If
your gonna claim its a performance product, lets see some before and after
data. If it does improve HP/TQ, it can only boost your sales, right???
<<if you want another issue to discuss.......try figuring out what increase
can be
had by putting a high flowing air filter into a restrictive
cannister........no
one ever wants to talk about that one.>>
YAP YAP YAP
<<Clip>>
<<<Get the facts straight before you post.......>>
The facts are, I asked a question about your 4.7L product, Does it increase
HP??
Do you have proof?? The Fact is, you haven't given the list any perf. data
on the 4.7L TB
.
<<>I am sure that enough of you know me out there, that you know I dont hide
from
questions, and that I back everything I sell. But I get kinda tired of all
these cheap shots from the side line coaches.>>
Cheap shots??? from who?? Just because someone asks you a question about
your product that you didn't answer on the 2nd time, and thats a cheap
shot???
<<<<sit here at 3am after <<<CLIP>>, but all this crap and bickering is
getting old.>>>>>
__________________________________
Matt--VA--Y2K-HEMI `00 Sport Plus RC
4.7L 5spd. 9 1/4 3.92 LSD, Homemade air intake,
T-Bars, Spring clamps, Mobil 1,Hoosiers
3" Flowmaster cat-back,14.48 @ 92.40 MPH
209.9 RWHP/285 RWTQ
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
<<Stlaurent Mr Steven wrote:>>
> This is what I was afraid of.
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barret, Matt [mailto:MATT_BARRET@earthtech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 6:07 AM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: DML: RE: Quick-D Throttle Body Re:Tony De Anda
>
> Bill, I posted a note to Tony (Quick D) Monday. I'm reposting it now:
>
> <<<Tony, what kind of HP increase are we talking about from your TB? Dyno
> numbers??
> There are several people out there that are doing these 4.7L mod TB's,
> taking alot of time, effort,and money to do them, and nobody wants to dyno
> one?? Let see what we're getting for the money.>>>
>
> I have asked Tony this question before, he won't respond to the question.
>
> Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> >From: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com [mailto:SEMIHEMI01@aol.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 8:48 AM
> >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >Subject: DML: Quick-D Throttle Body
>
> <<<Has anyone on DML really Dyno'ed a Quick-D throttle Body??? I know
it
>
> <flows better than stock but I am curious as to the % hp gain. I've got
one
> <coming for my 4.7 and I'll G-Tech it before & after but I was wondering
> about
> <the true dyno results. The G-Tech will be real close, I know.
> Bill<<<<<
>
> SEMIHEMI01 (Bill C.) 2001 QC, 4.7L, 5spd. 3.55 LSD, K-N Cool-Air,
SilBlades,
> 10w-30 MOBIL 1, 180 T'STAT, GIBSON 3" single side swept cat-back, G-TECH,
> <A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/semihemi01/">"THE DAK"</A>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:55:48 EDT