Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Street-Legal Supercar

From: Sean Bruckman (bruckman@urisp.com)
Date: Thu Oct 12 2000 - 11:03:50 EDT


So what you're saying is... ummm... what i said?

I agree.

Sean

----- Original Message -----
From: <AWyseGuy@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Re: Re: RE: Street-Legal Supercar

> In a message dated 10/11/2000 12:24:15 PM Central Daylight Time,
> bruckman@urisp.com writes:
>
>
> > there is a meeting point, but the viper will
> > never see the potential of the 680 HP, 2341 lb. (in race trim) McLaren.
> > Racing regulations aside, the McLaren has even more potential for
power...
> >
>
> Now you're not saying that anyone has the Viper motor pushed at all, are
you.
> It's barely tuned and running. If it had any level of technology put
into
> it.. You'd be looking at an 800HP street beast. Granted, a Viper
probably
> would need even more than 800HP to run with the F1; but that's only
because
> it outweighs it by so much.
> The Viper was a design exersize that became a reality while the F1.. is
> basically a racecar that was adapted to the street.
> I'd take the money I'd save by buying the Viper.. and have a set of 4
valve
> DOHC heads designed for it..
>
> Just MY $.02
> Aaron
> 95 Dakota Sport
> 86 Shelby Charger Turbo
> 94 Dakota WS.... was hoping it was going to be a Sport



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:55:58 EDT