Re: is: Scanner owners !total timing...was Re: Where Is Everyone From ?????

From: Bruce Bridges (bbridges@flometrics.com)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 05:33:18 EDT


Bob,
Thanks! I suspected the 96 and earlier PCMs had more timing than the later
perf units...Must verify! Im thinking my 98 truck is still missing a few
degrees (19-20 deg @ WOT rock solid) Id like to see at least 25deg. How
did the custom flash PCM effect your times?
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Tom <tigers@bserv.com>
To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: DML: is: Scanner owners !total timing...was Re: Where Is
Everyone From ?????

> At 10:48 AM 10/19/00 +0300, you wrote:
> > <snip>
> >For those of you with scanners, During WOT, What is your total timing
value
> >(minimum)...The trucks Ive seen back off to a solid 19-20 BTC... pretty
weak
> >for HP...Mopar small blocks Love lots of advance at WOT for power..
Bruce.
>
> Hi, Bruce.
>
> I recorded two 1/4 mile runs using a '96 Mopar PCM on my scanner.
>
> Both runs showed a minimum of 25 degrees just after the 2-3 shift
> with OD off at about the 3700 rpm range. Maximum advance was 31
> degrees in third at the 4700 to 4900 rpm range.
>
> I also tested a custom programmed computer which was calibrated
> for a blown/juice app. On both runs, WOT minimum advance was
> 17 degrees and max. was 21 degrees (if I remember correctly).
>
> Bob. Burlington, Ont., Canada.
> '97 Dakota CC, 5.2L, 4x2, 3.92 SG, auto., 4265 lb.
> Dyno: 231.2 rwhp 340.0 lb-ft rw torque
> PB: 14.737 @ 91.75 9.364 @ 72.95



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:56:12 EDT