Actually, I got 238.5.
The 3.9 is a 6cyl. 318.
318/8= 39.75
39.75*6= 238.5
Sounds like some weird math, right? It works, anyway.
Andy Wittkamper
__________________________________
http://www.members.tripod.com/TiptonFFA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Wong" <ron-wong@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 1:01 AM
Subject: DML: RE: 239, or 238????
It's 237.9 so 238 is correct. The multiplier is 61.
Ron
00 SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
For modifications see my DML Profile
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Chris Hannon
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:46 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: 239, or 238????
I was looking in my '95 Dakota FSM. It says the 3.9L V6's are 238 cubic
inches. I know it's not a big difference, but it just seems weird that
the FSM would have 238 and everyone calls it a 239 (including me).
Anyone have any idea who's right?
Later,
Chris Hannon
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:25 EDT