Re: late season test-n-tune @ Cecil pays off

From: WMBARRET@aol.com
Date: Sun Dec 10 2000 - 20:47:07 EST


Shane, Great runs there man!!!! Congratulations on 13.8's, almost a 13.7!!
woo man, that is awesome. Track was hooking up considerably better than last
month!! Short times at Cecil back in Nov were around 2.00 ??!! Makes a big
difference at the other end! Thats probably why you lost some speed, I
notice the same thing with my truck when the track is hooking good, ET goes
down, as well as MPH. Thats ok, I'll take those good low ET's. I'm assuming
that 1.89 60' was a Personal best for you???
I hit the 1.88 60' mark right before my spider gears decided to let go!!
Just think Shane, a 5spd behind that 360, and you're looking at low 13's !!
;-)

Congrats!

Matt Y2K-HEMI

In a message dated 12/10/00 6:58:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
Sbak1320@aol.com writes:

> Subj: DML: late season test-n-tune @ Cecil pays off
> Date: 12/10/00 6:58:40 PM Eastern Standard Time
> From: Sbak1320@aol.com
> Sender: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:dakota-truck@buffnet.net">
dakota-truck@buffnet.net</A>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net, cav.z24@juno.com, shaww@patsinc.com
>
> The conditions were great with low humidity, a good barometer reading and
> VERY cool air. The only part that wasn't so great was a 10 m.p.h. or so
(at
> most) cross breeze which probably affected the E.T. very little, if any.
> There were probably only a total of less than fifty vehicles racing which
> made for practically no wait at all in the staging lanes.
>
> Out of a total of nine passes, all but two of my runs were made with a
short
>
> belt in place. In sequential order they go: 1. 13.981 @ 95.89 (1.945
60')
> 2. 13.952 @ 96.14 (1.960 60')
> 3. no 1/4 mi.E.T or MPH given, but went 8.84 @ 77.26 in
> the 1/8
  
>
>
  
>
> (1.940 60')
> 4. 13.908 @ 96.18 (1.927 60')
> 5. 14.016 @ 95.77 (1.989 60') definitely heard and felt
> wheelspin on this one
> 6. 13.945 @ 95.69 (1.926 60')
> 7. 13.923 @ 96.18 (1.922 60')
>
> At this point I'm running out of time because the track will be closing
in
> about an hour and a half and I'd love to go home with a 13.8 something
> timeslip. So.... the serpentine belt is now completely taken off.
> 8. 13.830 @ 96.40 (1.905 60')
> 9. 13.819 @ 96.43 (1.897 60')
>
> The one thing that is very peculiar to me is my MPHs. I gained on average
.
> 5
> MPH in the 1/8 mi., but in the 1/4 mi. MPH I lost on average about .5 MPH.
 
> Guess maybe that huge tailwind I had on Oct. 29 when it went a best of 13.
> 984
> @ 96.91 helped my speed more than I originally thought. Another thing, I
> never imagined that I would hook as well as I did considering the cold
track
>
> surface/starting line temperature.
> Shane Baker
> '98 Dakota R/T RC
> Mods and timeslip at: http://hometown.aol.com/sbak1320/Index.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:57 EDT