Terry, I know the guy in Jax. runs his dyno sessions differently than
Precision. Next time you go, see if he'll let you unhook the TV cable and
run it in "D" only. We did that last time on Flummer's truck and were able
to get a data set from a LOT lower rpm than you can with the other methods.
I hope to get back to Belmont soon and play around.
______________________
Jon Smith--Raleigh, NC
www.fast4x4.net
jon@fast4x4.net
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
-
-Because of the different graph scales used between the dyno shop in
-Charlotte, NC I used last year and the one in Jacksonville, NC I used
-this year, it has been difficult for me to see the actual difference
-made by installing the M1 MPI intake, 1.7 roller rockers, headers, and
-high flow exhaust. To help me better see the difference, I took the
-different dyno sheets and plotted rwhp against rpm in an Excel
-spreadsheet, then created a new graph with the points plotted on the
-same scale. On the graph below, the red line is my current engine,
-and the blue line is my very first dyno I run, with just a Quick D
-intake and throttle body.
-http://users.isaac.net/therrin/dyno6_120900.jpg
-Because my first dyno run stopped at 5100 I stopped the graph there,
-but my current setup was still pulling 250rwhp when we shut it down at
-5600. Look at the blue line and imagine where the near stock would
-have been at 5600 had I ran it up that high. <grin> I think this
-graph speaks for itself to anyone considering the M1 MPI intake.
-
-Terry Herrin
-99 FR CC RT
-14.425 @ 93.52, 258 rwhp
-Wilmington, NC
-Dakota R/T Club, Executive Board, SE Region
-http://users.isaac.net/therrin/dakota.html
-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:25 EDT
