RE: Re: 87 vs. 89 Octane..What a Difference...

From: Steven St.Laurent (saint1958@home.com)
Date: Thu Jan 18 2001 - 23:04:05 EST


Nope.....talk to Bernd...

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
2000 Dakota Hemi 4.7 (WRECKED!!)
2000 Ford Roush Mustang Stage III - TT version (sold)
1999 Chebby (gone in 2003)
1993 Tracker (still going-going-going...)
--------------------------------
Aspiring for now:
2003 Dakota Hemi 5.7 or a V-10 mod
2003/4 Viper GTS-R

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Roger Lokay
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:22 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: 87 vs. 89 Octane..What a Difference...

I was planning to have the fuel system cleaned and to
have all the carbon-build up removed with the tune up
on Saturday, but the stuff to do it was not
available..so I will have to get it done soon. I am
thinking about putting 89 or 93 octane in it all ther
time, since it helped so much...

TTYL

=====
Thanks,
Roger W. Lokay
Proud Owner-
1990 Dodge Dakota 4x4
V6 3.9 Long Bed

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:37 EDT