RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 10:24:49 EST


Remember if you planned to port the TB, if you will not be able to run a
10PSI Turbo or SC unit. By porting the TB and then adding more PSI, this
will cause more stress on the TB walls.

My 02 cents.

-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: WOT or waiting at a Red [mailto:dakatack@home.com]
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 6:32 PM
To: dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7

Are you going to port and polish it?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:52 PM
Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7

> Thanks Patrick! It is deemed a 68mm per the part numbers. The Quick D
> intake made it easy to check.
>
>
> --
> Richard
> ""WOT or waiting at a Red"" <dakatack@home.com> wrote in message
> news:003d01c08a47$a42b8300$6026b018@potlnd1.or.home.com...
> > Richard
> >
> > There is a stap on the top of the TB
> > 53013241AC is a 65mm
> > 53013163AA is a 68mm
> >
> > Also it's stamped with the size on the blade. You will need to use a
> mirror
> > to see it.
> >
> > Patrick O'Day
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 1:29 PM
> > Subject: DML: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
> >
> >
> > > I have a 2001 QC 4.7 built in October of 2000, how can I tell if I
have
> > the
> > > 68mm throttle body?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Richard
> > > <RobertE.Tucker@gunter.af.mil> wrote in message
> > > news:6E8C7034C8875D41A80E36C22E15B43016FA0D@FSJUBJ08...
> > > > I am looking to upgrade the TB on my 2000 4.7L and have a question:
> > Would
> > > > it be better to replace the original 65MM TB on the 2000 4.7L with a
> > > QuickD
> > > > version, or to simply replace it with the 68MM TB from the 2001
4.7L?
> > > >
> > > > Bob Tucker
> > > > 2000 CC, 4.7, 3.92 ASD,
> > > > IP Cold Air Intake
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:48 EDT