Steven
Good point. I won't be using a SC or TC on this truck. However, I was
wondering if the outside diameter could be reinforced with a sleeve. It
would be a simple device to manufacture and could be applied with RTV or
other sealant.
Just a thought
Patrick O'Day
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stlaurent Mr Steven" <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 7:24 AM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
> Remember if you planned to port the TB, if you will not be able to run a
> 10PSI Turbo or SC unit. By porting the TB and then adding more PSI, this
> will cause more stress on the TB walls.
>
> My 02 cents.
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
> 760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
> Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
> Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WOT or waiting at a Red [mailto:dakatack@home.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 6:32 PM
> To: dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
>
> Are you going to port and polish it?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:52 PM
> Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
>
>
> > Thanks Patrick! It is deemed a 68mm per the part numbers. The Quick D
> > intake made it easy to check.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Richard
> > ""WOT or waiting at a Red"" <dakatack@home.com> wrote in message
> > news:003d01c08a47$a42b8300$6026b018@potlnd1.or.home.com...
> > > Richard
> > >
> > > There is a stap on the top of the TB
> > > 53013241AC is a 65mm
> > > 53013163AA is a 68mm
> > >
> > > Also it's stamped with the size on the blade. You will need to use a
> > mirror
> > > to see it.
> > >
> > > Patrick O'Day
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
> > > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 1:29 PM
> > > Subject: DML: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
> > >
> > >
> > > > I have a 2001 QC 4.7 built in October of 2000, how can I tell if I
> have
> > > the
> > > > 68mm throttle body?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Richard
> > > > <RobertE.Tucker@gunter.af.mil> wrote in message
> > > > news:6E8C7034C8875D41A80E36C22E15B43016FA0D@FSJUBJ08...
> > > > > I am looking to upgrade the TB on my 2000 4.7L and have a
question:
> > > Would
> > > > > it be better to replace the original 65MM TB on the 2000 4.7L with
a
> > > > QuickD
> > > > > version, or to simply replace it with the 68MM TB from the 2001
> 4.7L?
> > > > >
> > > > > Bob Tucker
> > > > > 2000 CC, 4.7, 3.92 ASD,
> > > > > IP Cold Air Intake
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:48 EDT