Yeah,they need more catalytic converters,4 shore.That
would be an excellent cost-cutting measure that
Schrempp can really sink his teeth into,go back to the
single cat on everything.
--- WOT or waiting at a Red <dakatack@home.com> wrote:
> Richard
>
> Not with the extra two Catalytic converters that
> were added.
>
> Patrick O'Day
> 2000 Dakota 4x4, 4.7L, CC
> Ztube w/9 inch big mouth filter
> 68 MM TB Ported and Polished
> Rancho 9000 Shocks
> Robert Shaw 755 180F Thermostat
> Mobil 1
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 10:09 AM
> Subject: DML: Re: 68mm 4.7l tb
>
>
> > That is a good question. Shouldn't the
> horsepower/torque specifications
> for
> > the 2001 model year truck increase due to the
> larger throttle body?
> >
> > '01 Dakota Quad Cab
> > Richard
> >
> > --
> > "John Clawson" <johnc@asltg.com> wrote in message
> > news:3A8411D9.175AA87B@asltg.com...
> > > Thanks to Patrick and James(?) for the lead on
> 68mm tb.
> > > Now that I've spent the $, can I expect
> noticeable gains over my 65mm
> > > without modifying it?
> > >
> > > TIA
> > > jc
> > > 00 Sport,cc,4.7,4X4,auto,3.92sg,
> > > Quickd air,Flowmaster,180 tstat,Jet II
> > >
> >
> >
>
=====
Steve Preston 1999 Dakota Sport 3.9V6,4x4,3.92 Anti-spin,42RE auto,Intense Blue,regular cab.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:12 EDT