Re: RE: Ok, time for the real numbers, hehehe (no really!)

From: Y2KDakuda@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 08:18:00 EST

Next message: Y2KDakuda@aol.com: "Re: Re: RE: 5.9 R/T Vs. 00 GT -Videos"
Previous message: Nick Shue: "Re: RE: Re: Re: 4.7 to 3.7 = more problems???"
Maybe in reply to: Tom Slick North: "RE: Ok, time for the real numbers, hehehe (no really!)"
Next in thread: TommFern@aol.com: "Re: Ok, time for the real numbers, hehehe (no really!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

You better be at VMP March 17th I got to see that thing run down the track. Great times man

Chris

Next message: Y2KDakuda@aol.com: "Re: Re: RE: 5.9 R/T Vs. 00 GT -Videos"
Previous message: Nick Shue: "Re: RE: Re: Re: 4.7 to 3.7 = more problems???"
Maybe in reply to: Tom Slick North: "RE: Ok, time for the real numbers, hehehe (no really!)"
Next in thread: TommFern@aol.com: "Re: Ok, time for the real numbers, hehehe (no really!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:32 EDT