Oh shit...you're right. Oops. (Sorry Mr. Beer Can Will) ;)
- Bernd
> Will Coughlin?!?!?! Bernd, com'on! Ease up on the iced mocha-venti
> whatever. Remember, Will Coughlin is the guy with the cherry Dak that
> details it all of the time and won't go over 2600 (I believe) RPMs. Now,
> if he ran 9.91 and 142 mph without going over 3k RPMs, I'm gonna start
> detailing my undercarriage before I take this damned suit off! You're
> talking about Beer Can Will in Starkville!
>
> Yes, it is awesome, though. Man!!!!
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:12:19 US/Central bernd@texas.net writes:
> >
> >
> > Will Coughlin ran a 9.91 @ 142mph (1/4 mile) just this last weekend
> > with his 96
> > (hope that's right on the year) "Stroker" Dakota. Pretty awesome if
> > ya ask
> > me. :)
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
> >
> > > What?????
> > >
> > > Did I miss something, 9 second what????????
> > >
> > >
> > > TommFern@aol.com on 02/27/2001 10:39:00 PM
> > > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net@Internet
> > > cc: (bcc: Frank T Holloway/CA/KAIPERM)
> > > Subject: Re: DML: Re: TechStuff/Will/Starkville
> > >
> > > In a message dated 2/27/01 9:11:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> > > smoseley@ix.netcom.com writes:
> > >
> > > <<
> > > Yeah - no offense to you Frank (and Tom and others - you know who
> > you are) -
> > > but
> > > isn't it funny how all of a sudden after someone runs a 9 second
> > ET that now
> > > there are lots more tech stuff flying around. As for the IAT,
> > MAP and TPS
> > > stuff
> > > - your buddy Bernd is your best resource there as he has done
> > most of the
> > > testing that everyone else just wonders about. But better than
> > that - he is
> > > MORE than willing to share his results. Lets see them cards yall
> > 8-).
> > >
> > > Please don't let this piss off some of you - as it is only meant
> > to bring
> > > some
> > > more out so Bernd isn't burdened so much flogging his mule all
> > the time.
> > > Lord
> > > knows we've all seen/heard of lots of that 8-)) j/k LOL
> > > >>
> > > Your point well taken. For me it's a couple of reasons. First, I
> > have been
> > > insanely busy. I just got done with my thesis and have now turned
> > it in. I
> > > should have some more free time to talk. Secondly, I and a few of
> > the others
> > > our on different levels. I'm not at all dogging anyone who wants
> > to know
> > > about which catback to buy. We all have to start somewhere. We're
> > just
> > > different in our needs. I honestly couldn't tell a guy which is
> > the best to
> > > buy. It's been way too long for me to relate. On the other hand,
> > if someone
> > > wants to talk about the efficacy of doing dual 3" with turn downs,
> > I may
> > > chime up. Lets face it, a message board would be a lot easier. We
> > all delete
> > > threads that may actually be good topics. Its nothing personal. I
> > defer a lot
> > > of it to guys who are at that stage and can help more. I don't
> > know, maybe
> > > I'm becoming an out of touch elitist.LOL
> > > PS: No smarta$$ emails from you guys on what catback to buy.LOL
> > ;)
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> ________________________________________________________________
> GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
> Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
> Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:53 EDT