RE: RE: Hughes Engines 4.7L 68mm flow data is in......

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Tue Mar 06 2001 - 13:07:52 EST


It was around 6xx range on his beta version. He has a flow bench below his
office.

Matt, I have to laugh with the statement that they need to add the adapter
for a clean flow. Bruce had this added on when I used his beta TB. It
looked very intimidating.

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
(Work) 760-725-2506 (DSN: 365)
(Work) mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
(Home) mailto:saint1958@home.com
"In fact, my work has already proven
itself to be correct. People such
as you just haven't gotten it yet.
(unknown author)

-----Original Message-----
From: WMBARRET@aol.com [mailto:WMBARRET@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 9:33 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Hughes Engines 4.7L 68mm flow data is in......

Bernd, You and I are use to seeing 25" h2o, Dave usually does both! 400
cfm@ 10" is 630 cfm@ 25", and 450 cfm @ 10" is 712 cfm@25"

Steve, what kinda flow numbers is Bruce getting out of his design?? Price??

Matt Y2K-HEMI

In a message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:17:51 PM Eastern Standard Time,
bernd@texas.net writes:

<<
454CFM?? Are you sure those numbers are correct? Seems rather small for a
4.7L. (Considering that the 3.9L is at 500+CFM)

- Bernd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: WMBARRET@aol.com [mailto:WMBARRET@aol.com]
> Subject: DML: Hughes Engines 4.7L 68mm flow data is in......
>
> Ok folks, I talked to Hughes Engines this morning and Dave has flowed the
> 4.7L 68mm TB in stock form, and after his Stage I mod. and here are the
> DISSAPOINTING results.
>
> 65mm TB (Stock) 400 cfm
> 65mm TB (Stage I) 450 cfm
>
> 68mm TB (Stock) 420 cfm (5% increase over stock 65mm)
> 68mm TB (Stage I) 454 cfm (1% increase over Stage I 65mm)
>

>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:58 EDT