Matt,
Im going to be more expensive than $150.00 thats for sure! 750cfm is aVERY
conservative number for the 69mm billet....Well see what the bench says once
I get the first one finished! Theres no way I can compete on a cost basis
re: ported TB vs new Billet TB...Ive got to make it up in performance,
looks, and getting more than a ported TB can get (and showing that it works
better due to that...) Those walls on the Hughes unit must be getting mighty
thin!
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: <WMBARRET@aol.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 4:50 AM
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Hughes Engines 4.7L 68mm flow data is in......
> Thanks Bruce, for clarifying! Yesterday, Hughes had the 68mm TB up to
712cfm+-, and they were still working on it. It sounds like if you need that
extra 5-10% flow increase, your billet TB is the way to go!
> I'd be interested to see how the cost compares.
> Regular Price for the TB work @ Hughes is $150.00.
>
> Matt Y2K-HEMI
>
>
>
> In a message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2001 5:41:12 PM Eastern Standard Time,
"Bruce Bridges" <bbridges@flometrics.com> writes:
>
> << FYI!
> F&B magnum V8 50mm TBs flow about 550CFM @ 11", 790cfm @ 25"
> The 69mm 4.7s Target is about the same. I havnt got the final product
yet,
> so I havnt been able to do any flow work.... I wont release until we get
at
> least 750CFM @ 25" (should be real easy!)
> Bruce
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <bernd@texas.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 6:02 AM
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: Hughes Engines 4.7L 68mm flow data is in......
>
>
> >
> > That's what I thought....just seemed strange that there was no
measurement
> > specs and 454CFM. No biggie...
> >
> > I believe Bruce's are around 780-800CFM (from what I got on the phone
> earlier).
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
> >
> > > Bernd, You and I are use to seeing 25" h2o, Dave usually does both!
> 400
> > cfm@ 10" is 630
> > cfm@ 25", and 450 cfm @ 10" is 712 cfm@25"
> > >
> > > Steve, what kinda flow numbers is Bruce getting out of his design??
> Price??
> > >
> > > Matt Y2K-HEMI
> > >
> > > In a message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:17:51 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > bernd@texas.net
> > writes:
> > >
> > > <<
> > > 454CFM?? Are you sure those numbers are correct? Seems rather small
> for a
> > > 4.7L. (Considering that the 3.9L is at 500+CFM)
> > >
> > > - Bernd
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:59 EDT