duh, i was thinking backwards
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: DML: IAT box & dyno results -- tech discussion
>
> Uhhhh...no. 10 - 11:1 is on the rather rich side. 15.5+ is lean.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of TJ Goettner
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 7:51 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: IAT box & dyno results -- tech discussion
>
>
> Isnt 10:1 and 11:1 a little on the lean side?
>
>
> TJ
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 12:41 PM
> Subject: RE: DML: IAT box & dyno results -- tech discussion
>
>
> >
> > On the IAT Adjuster and how it affects the fuel enrichment, well...we
just
> > got back from the Dyno shop and now have proof that you can adjust the
> fuel
> > enrichment with it...went from 10:1 to 11.2:1 just by turning the knob.
> > This was tested on Richard Pyburn's '95 SLT (Supercharged 5.2L).
> >
> > Shane, I do stand corrected on one item: Closed loop can happen with
the
> > truck running for 3 minutes and the coolant temp was still under 100
> > degrees. You are right! :) (See, we learn something new everyday.)
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: IAT box & dyno results -- tech discussion
> >
> > No - in fact - they error on the side of richness because being overly
> rich
> > is
> > always better than getting anywhere close to lean - which melts engines
> > down. I
> > don't see how going more rich can possibly help (nor do I see it in
Jon's
> > dyno
> > graph). Are any of you guys even using an A/F gauge?
> >
> > Latr,
> >
> > Shane
> >
> >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:25 EDT