35k! that is excellent. On our new Durango at work, we have about 7k on the
RT/S. about time for new tires. Then again, driving on super abrasive and
grooved runways will do that =)
X---------------------CrawdaddY--------------------------------------X
http://members.home.net/ggaskin
ICQ UIN# 2325710
New Orleans, La
http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/GgYMEmNMV9Dtw/profile.htm
see above profile for more info on my Dak =]
X--------------------------------------------------------------------X
----- Original Message -----
From: <axclr8@usa.net>
To: "Dakota Post" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:43 PM
Subject: DML: tire question
> At 35k, my badyears are about shot - thus I am looking at new tires. I
have
> already decided to stay with the stock 31x10.50 size but I am considering
more
> aggressive tread. (those $%!!#$% stock RT/S tires get stuck on wet grass -
> don't ask...) My question is this: Between the mid range mud tires (bfg
mud,
> General M/T, etc.) and the all-out mud tires (Super swampers, gumbo
mudders,
> etc.) what opinions do you have. Are the super swampers worth the
inevitable
> mileage hit? Are all of the radial mud terrain tires really created
equal?
> Has anybody started running the new SSR's? What about some of the more
> aggressive looking all terrains like the BFG AT or grabber AP's? I am not
> really looking for someone to tell me what's best, just opinions like " I
> bought brand X tires, and I onlt got 5000 miles on them before they were
used
> up - or I have such and such, and I really like them..
>
> -AXCLR8
> 99CC, SLT+, 4x4, 318, LSD, Rolltop, Permatech.
>
> For off-list contact, please include either DML or VFR in your subject
line to
> keep your Email from being filtered into my trash bin. Thanks.
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:33 EDT