Re: Suspension lift on 2wd Vs 4wd

From: Thumper (thumper72@lvcm.com)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 02:38:53 EST


Thanks Jason!

Bill Boggs
ICQ# 96440831
thumper72@lvcm.com
http://www.lvcm.com/thumper/white_lightning.html
"White Lightning"
2001 CC 2WD Sport+ 4.7 Auto

> Bill,
> A 2wd is less money as Bernd pointed out because you just have
> to swap the spindles, coil springs, and maybe the A-arms without
> having to worry about maintaining the geometry of the drivetrain
> to the front wheels (because there is no drivetrain to the front
> wheels). That's the expensive part on the 4wd's as I believe
> both the Rancho and Tough Country kits lower the front axle
> assembly including torsion bars . . . that equals a lot more
> hardware, more labor to install, and therefore more $ to lift.
> Wish I had the cash to make mine mini-monster style, but I'll
> just have to settle for my 2" body lift and 32" tires for
> awhile.
>
> JY
>
> --- Thumper <thumper72@lvcm.com> wrote:
> > Ok, I got My JCWhitney sport truck catalog today and see they
> > have a 3"
> > Fabtech suspension lift listed for 97-00 Dakota 2WD's only. I
> > dont plan on
> > lifting my DAK (I plan on lowering it) but was wondering what
> > the difference
> > is in lifting a 2wd vs a 4wd?
> >
> > Bill Boggs
> > ICQ# 96440831
> > thumper72@lvcm.com
> > http://www.lvcm.com/thumper/white_lightning.html
> > "White Lightning"
> > 2001 CC 2WD Sport+ 4.7 Auto
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:36 EDT