Re: 65mm vs 68mm TB 4.7L

From: Wxman (Wxman@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Apr 07 2001 - 17:11:56 EDT


Great! Thanks for the info. I think I will try this because it is not too
costly. Is the stage I you refer to a port and polish by Hughes engines or
was someone else doing the work?

Wxman
<WMBARRET@aol.com> wrote in message news:3e.9f361d4.2800c37c@aol.com...
> Ok, I found the Data that Hughes Engines furnished me.
>
> 65mm TB (Stock) 400 cfm
> 65mm TB (Stage I) 450 cfm
>
> 68mm TB (Stock) 420 cfm
> 68mm TB (Stage I) 481 cfm
>
> Matt Y2K-HEMI
> '00 RC 4.7L 5spd
> 14.23@94.49
>
>
>
> In a message dated Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:30:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
"Wxman" <Wxman@hotmail.com> writes:
>
> << Thanks to all for the quick responses. I think I will try this. It
will be
> actually be on a 2K Durango. No one on any Durango sites would admit to
> trying it. I will post G-Tech results here as well when I get them.
>
> Thanks again,
> Wxman
>
> ""Wxman"" <Wxman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:9aln7b$pl1$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> > Has anyone actually made this swap? I know the 2001 TBs are 68mm vs the
> > 65mm that came in the 2000 models. Is everything else the same for a
> direct
> > bolt-on replacement? I have heard yes, but never from anyone who has
> > actually done it. If it will work I will make the swap and post before
> and
> > after G-tech numbers.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Wxman
> >
> >
>
>
> >>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:58 EDT