Re: Re: 65mm vs 68mm TB 4.7L

From: Wxman (Wxman@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Apr 07 2001 - 17:28:38 EDT


Oooops. Found the answer at the hughesengines website. I think I will get
a 2001 68mm TB and then send it in to Hughes to have it worked.

Thanks again,
Wxman
""Wxman"" <Wxman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9anvo1$a07$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> Great! Thanks for the info. I think I will try this because it is not
too
> costly. Is the stage I you refer to a port and polish by Hughes engines
or
> was someone else doing the work?
>
> Wxman
> <WMBARRET@aol.com> wrote in message news:3e.9f361d4.2800c37c@aol.com...
> > Ok, I found the Data that Hughes Engines furnished me.
> >
> > 65mm TB (Stock) 400 cfm
> > 65mm TB (Stage I) 450 cfm
> >
> > 68mm TB (Stock) 420 cfm
> > 68mm TB (Stage I) 481 cfm
> >
> > Matt Y2K-HEMI
> > '00 RC 4.7L 5spd
> > 14.23@94.49
> >
> >
> >
> > In a message dated Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:30:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> "Wxman" <Wxman@hotmail.com> writes:
> >
> > << Thanks to all for the quick responses. I think I will try this. It
> will be
> > actually be on a 2K Durango. No one on any Durango sites would admit to
> > trying it. I will post G-Tech results here as well when I get them.
> >
> > Thanks again,
> > Wxman
> >
> > ""Wxman"" <Wxman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:9aln7b$pl1$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> > > Has anyone actually made this swap? I know the 2001 TBs are 68mm vs
the
> > > 65mm that came in the 2000 models. Is everything else the same for a
> > direct
> > > bolt-on replacement? I have heard yes, but never from anyone who has
> > > actually done it. If it will work I will make the swap and post
before
> > and
> > > after G-tech numbers.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Wxman
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:00:58 EDT