Actually, if that's a 3.55 equipped. '99 4x4, that's about right. The '99
is MUCH heavier than
the '92 model....
Sam '00 RT & '99 4x4 RT (he he)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Paul Bullerman
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:07 PM
> To: dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> Subject: Re: DML: headers and mpg!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Levy" <andylevy@bigfoot.com>
> To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 7:36 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: headers and mpg!
>
>
> > Your best ever with that setup is 16.60? Last summer I consistently got
> > 17+ on highway runs with my '99 4x4 5.2 auto.
> >
> Thats not that good, my old 92 318 4x4 with JBAs got at least 19-20 on the
> hiway, best of 22.
> My 4.7 got 20 coming back from VMP last year, it was barely broken in.
> Although I set the cruise on 65-67 MPH, right around 2 grand with 3.55s.
> put in those expensive NGK's and I actually saw 14's around town
> on the last
> tank. Didnt train the foot either, although traffic helped.
> Boog
> 2k SC 4x4 4.7 auto
> Ztube, 68 mm TB, magnaflow muffler.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:05 EDT