Re: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!

From: Steven T. Ekstrand (cyberlaw@earthlink.net)
Date: Thu May 17 2001 - 15:41:23 EDT

Next message: Krawdaddy: "Re: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!"
Previous message: Brian Stewart: "RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!"
In reply to: Brian Stewart: "RE: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!"
Next in thread: Krawdaddy: "Re: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

| oops, meant 3.92gears, not 2.92

Well, the 2.92's would get better mileage.... :-)

Next message: Krawdaddy: "Re: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!"
Previous message: Brian Stewart: "RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!"
In reply to: Brian Stewart: "RE: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!"
Next in thread: Krawdaddy: "Re: SS S-10 Ssspank!!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:30 EDT