RE: 5.9 availabiliy

From: Karsh (karsh@cox-internet.com)
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 17:30:43 EDT


Yeah that's what I'm thinking so far. If my purpose was to build a $X$
hotrod then the 5.9 I think would have been the better choice but I need
mine as a daily driver. I'll be off road some too but nothing like the
Drakar or anything. Thanks for he response Josh

Karsh

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Josh Stolarz
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:13 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: 5.9 availabiliy

You made a wise choice... The 5.9 does produce alot more torque, but the 4.7
is a nice all around engine. The fuel economy is much better and that is
important right now...

No Flames... Just and honest "Opinion", we are all entitled to them....

Josh

""Karsh"" <karsh@cox-internet.com> wrote in message
news:000001c0dfdb$3c629760$6501a8c0@tcac.net...
> I almost got mine with the 5.9 but opted for the 4.7 instead. It only
made
> the 10 more horse so I figured what the heck. Don/t tell me I made a huge
> mistake ? Does it perform that much better?
>
> Karsh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET]On Behalf Of Steven T. Ekstrand
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:03 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: 5.9 availabiliy
>
>
> You could put a factory New Venture 5-speed in for that matter. A couple
> of people have done that, although nobody I know of with a 360 Quad
cab....
>
> Ron, there's a new challenge for ya'!!!
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:30 EDT