RE: Re: T-Stat for V6 99 Dakota!!!

• Next message: Ed Halterman: "Re: overheating problems/dodge full of @#$%?"
• Previous message: Y2KDakuda@aol.com: "Re: Stolen Spare Tire"
• In reply to: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: T-Stat for V6 99 Dakota!!!"
• Next in thread: \(MAGNUM S/T\): "Re: T-Stat for V6 99 Dakota!!! ..Bernd"
• Reply: \(MAGNUM S/T\): "Re: T-Stat for V6 99 Dakota!!! ..Bernd"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Here's the funny thing Ron....

I went through my old receipts and I used a Robert Shaw 370-180 about a
year ago (listed it on the Lonestar website as well). When I fixed the
intake manifold, I replaced it with the same...but the receipt said
300-180. Now...I just replaced it again to a 160 (testing something)
and the packaging stated 370-160. (My bad on the 300-180 comment)

I'm going to call up Packeton/Flowkooler/RobertShaw on Monday AM to find
out exactly which one is the correct P/N. I'm wondering if there's
either a mis-marking on the package or the receipt.

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET] On Behalf Of Ronald Wong
Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: T-Stat for V6 99 Dakota!!!

370?? I think he said he had a 330-180. No wonder it didn't fit right.
Are you sure it's 370? That doesn't sound right to me either.

Ron

• Next message: Ed Halterman: "Re: overheating problems/dodge full of @#$%?"
• Previous message: Y2KDakuda@aol.com: "Re: Stolen Spare Tire"
• In reply to: Ronald Wong: "RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: T-Stat for V6 99 Dakota!!!"
• Next in thread: \(MAGNUM S/T\): "Re: T-Stat for V6 99 Dakota!!! ..Bernd"
• Reply: \(MAGNUM S/T\): "Re: T-Stat for V6 99 Dakota!!! ..Bernd"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:01:43 EDT